Women in tech

This article transitions from passive aggressive to outright aggressive from beginning to end. The opening sentence, "It is equal parts hilarious and depressing that Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt was called out for repeatedly interrupting Megan Smith, chief technology officer for the United States, while trying to talk about diversity and women in tech" comes across almost mockingly. The final two sentences, "if men in male-dominated fields like tech (and politics and venture capital and journalism and and and…) are serious about diversity and women’s leadership, then they need to STFU more often. Literally. The problem will not be solved by women leaning in. Instead, men need to lean back. Hard." are downright harsh and aggressive. The author's tone makes me feel like she is bias and doesn't understand or bother to look into the male side of the argument. The title, "Lean back, Eric Schmidt! How interrupting men & unconscious bias are killing women’s careers" also seems overzealous. Although the article provides factual evidence that men interrupt women far more often than they interrupt men or women interrupt men, it gives no evidence that this is killing women's careers. The article also asks for men to "debug" or stop interrupting women. In addition perhaps there should be a call to action for women to stand up against being interrupting or exploit and expose the problem.